95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.68%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.85%
Positive growth while FNV shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.63%
Margin expansion 50-75% of FNV's 6.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
Similar G&A growth to FNV's 88.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
736.29%
Other expenses change of 736.29% while FNV maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
69.77%
Similar operating expenses growth to FNV's 88.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
0.75%
Total costs growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.45%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.74%
EBITDA decline while FNV shows 300.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.66%
EBITDA margin decline while FNV shows 346.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.90%
Operating income decline while FNV shows 173.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.33%
Operating margin decline while FNV shows 190.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
80.52%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of FNV's 133.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-2.25%
Pre-tax income decline while FNV shows 173.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FNV's 190.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-156.85%
Tax expense reduction while FNV shows 125.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.50%
Net income growth below 50% of FNV's 195.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of FNV's 217.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of FNV's 196.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FNV's 196.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.19%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.