PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Revenue decline while FNV shows 8.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.90%
Cost reduction while FNV shows 17.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.30%
Gross profit decline while FNV shows 4.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.63%
Other expenses change of 131.63% while FNV maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-55.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.07%
Total costs reduction while FNV shows 12.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.61%
Interest expense reduction while FNV shows 172.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.33%
D&A reduction while FNV shows 18.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.04%
EBITDA decline while FNV shows 7.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EBITDA margin growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.75%
Operating income decline while FNV shows 9.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.48%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
74.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of FNV's 200.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FNV's 10.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.30%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 1.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-14030.23%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.90%
Net income growth below 50% of FNV's 14.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.62%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 5.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.06%
EPS growth below 50% of FNV's 14.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FNV's 14.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.63%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while FNV shows 0.45% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.