95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.24%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 1.44%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
19.83%
Cost increase while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.19%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 3.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.46%
Margin decline while FNV shows 2.10% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
G&A growth less than half of FNV's 138.46%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.04%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FNV's 138.46%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
19.98%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.03%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-88.07%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.16%
D&A growth above 1.5x FNV's 6.27%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
10.10%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 3.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.64%
EBITDA margin decline while FNV shows 2.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.00%
Operating income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.74%
Tax expense growth while FNV reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.04%
Net income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.86%
EPS growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.86%
Diluted EPS growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.