PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.41%
Revenue decline while FNV shows 3.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
10.38%
Cost increase while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-9.76%
Gross profit decline while FNV shows 7.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.47%
Margin decline while FNV shows 3.40% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.76%
Other expenses change of 100.76% while FNV maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-41.50%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.56%
Total costs growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.69%
Interest expense reduction while FNV shows 122.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.99%
D&A growth while FNV reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.34%
EBITDA decline while FNV shows 1.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
EBITDA margin growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.19%
Operating income decline while FNV shows 9.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.85%
Operating margin decline while FNV shows 5.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
64.26%
Other expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.60%
Pre-tax income decline while FNV shows 6.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while FNV shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.04%
Tax expense reduction while FNV shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.33%
Net income decline while FNV shows 7.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Net margin decline while FNV shows 3.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.71%
EPS decline while FNV shows 8.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.71%
Diluted EPS decline while FNV shows 8.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.14%
Share count reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.