PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
44.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.77%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
45.91%
Cost growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
43.20%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 1.16%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Margin decline while FNV shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.26%
G&A growth while FNV reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.66%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.30%
Operating expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.11%
Total costs growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.56%
Interest expense reduction while FNV shows 17.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
53.28%
D&A growth above 1.5x FNV's 5.31%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
50.51%
EBITDA growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.82%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 1.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.39%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-107.84%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 113.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
39.66%
Pre-tax income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.63%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
44.74%
Net income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Net margin growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
EPS growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
Diluted EPS growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.04%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.02%
Diluted share increase while FNV reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.