PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.27%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.18%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.28%
Similar margin change to FNV's 2.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.10%
G&A reduction while FNV shows 63.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
140.62%
Marketing expense growth less than half of FNV's 1821.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
70.89%
Other expenses change of 70.89% while FNV maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-28.25%
Operating expenses reduction while FNV shows 58.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.73%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.63%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.57%
EBITDA decline while FNV shows 124.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.65%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FNV's 129.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.58%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
888.96%
Other expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.79%
Pre-tax income decline while FNV shows 117.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FNV's 121.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
99.20%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-2.61%
Net income decline while FNV shows 114.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of FNV's 117.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.26%
EPS decline while FNV shows 114.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while FNV shows 114.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.