PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.82%
Growth of 19.82% while FSM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
14.83%
Cost growth of 14.83% while FSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
26.25%
Growth of 26.25% while FSM shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
5.37%
Margin change of 5.37% while FSM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.94%
Other expenses change of 28.94% while FSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
29.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 5.80%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.68%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSM's 5.80%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.17%
D&A growth less than half of FSM's 108.64%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
26.25%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.63%
Margin change of 3.63% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
25.56%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.80%
Margin change of 4.80% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
116.35%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 1292.79%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
28.21%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.01%
Margin change of 7.01% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-35.52%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 1.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
29.72%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.26%
Margin change of 8.26% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
33.33%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.53%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.