95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.14%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.00%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.47%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.42%
Margin decline while FSM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.90%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 7434.03%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.47%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 172.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.07%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 172.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.47%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 7434.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.48%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.94%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
505.88%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 4713.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-6.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.64%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.68%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 55.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.09%
Margin change of 1.09% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Share count change of 0.05% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
1.31%
Diluted share change of 1.31% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.