95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
47.14%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSM's 147.18%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
22.77%
Cost growth of 22.77% while FSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
70.16%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSM's 147.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.65%
Margin change of 15.65% while FSM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
221.86%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 2.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
21.97%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSM's 317.39%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
22.67%
Total costs growth less than half of FSM's 317.39%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.83%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
72.99%
Similar EBITDA growth to FSM's 97.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
17.98%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.16%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.08%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-38.78%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 4957.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
77.42%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.58%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-112.65%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 283.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
96.62%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.63%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.21%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.88%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.