95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.51%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.37%
Cost increase while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.54%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.94%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 14.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-680.71%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 79.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-506.47%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-134.42%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
96.31%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.99%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 9.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
118.24%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.82%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 14.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
258.57%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.39%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
109.92%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 13.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4162.76%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 51.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.52%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.97%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.72%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.