95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.05%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 66.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.69%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 28.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.94%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 153.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 52.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
Other expenses change of 15.84% while FSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
15.76%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.08%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
83.18%
Interest expense change of 83.18% while FSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
15.76%
D&A growth 50-75% of FSM's 26.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-4.94%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 1216.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.37%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 665.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 247.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 188.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.08%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.00%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 254.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 193.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-488.93%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 245.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.35%
Net income decline while FSM shows 158.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.45%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 135.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
EPS decline while FSM shows 139.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 139.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.36%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 9.65%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 30.38%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.