95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.50%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 12.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.48%
Cost growth less than half of FSM's 14.36%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.30%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 9.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.00%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.28%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 277.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.20%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 79.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.59%
Interest expense growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.49%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 27.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.65%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
145.30%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 24.61%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-16.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.11%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.34%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 2.68%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.70%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.