95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.93%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-29.83%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 160.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.75%
Margin decline while FSM shows 172.88% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.76%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-55.20%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 262.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.61%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 10.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-18.00%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 9.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-19.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.25%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 156.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-19.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.58%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-119.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.17%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.72%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.11%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.01%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.11%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.