95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
222.53%
Cost growth of 222.53% while FSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-82.43%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.30%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.42%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
147.69%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.48%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-86.12%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 35.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2651.65%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 138.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-365.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-365.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-362.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-361.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-300.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-325.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.15%
Share count change of 16.15% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
9.54%
Diluted share change of 9.54% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.