95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.09%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 7.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.37%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.91%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 19.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.19%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 11.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
G&A growth while FSM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.27%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.55%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 12.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.82%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 128.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.84%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 2111.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.34%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 69.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.77%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 57.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-591.95%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 99.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.32%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 194.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.81%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 174.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.42%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 89.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.16%
Net income decline while FSM shows 451.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.45%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 414.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 346.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.