95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.75%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-18.65%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
14.32%
Similar gross profit growth to FSM's 16.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
8.10%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 28.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.99%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 126.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-52.97%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 2727.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.05%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 5.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.55%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
17.06%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.69%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.60%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.82%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-98.54%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 106.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.82%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
71.42%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.65%
Net income decline while FSM shows 13.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.05%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 24.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
94.44%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 4.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
88.89%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 4.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.