95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.91%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 104.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.94%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 160.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.35%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 69.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
G&A change of 0.94% while FSM maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.36%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 8.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.90%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 19.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.03%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 107.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.39%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 43.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.27%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 57.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.67%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.96%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 114.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.00%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 4.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-97.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.58%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 81.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.34%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
272.83%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 71.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-8.80%
Net income decline while FSM shows 66.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.52%
EPS decline while FSM shows 60.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.52%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 60.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.