95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.05%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSM's 26.55%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.32%
Cost growth less than half of FSM's 3.72%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
4.81%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSM's 58.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.73%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 25.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.37%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 157.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
34.04%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.92%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.07%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 16.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.23%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 149.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.83%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 48.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.70%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 272.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.34%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 194.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
192.31%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 83.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3.84%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 272.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.21%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 194.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1408.11%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.68%
Net income growth below 50% of FSM's 733.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.28%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 600.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.44%
EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 648.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.