95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.89%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.72%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSM's 10.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-3.63%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 1259.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
124.45%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.45%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 6.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
16.41%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSM's 9.85%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.39%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x FSM's 21.83%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-1.18%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-230.00%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 72.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.76%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.75%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while FSM shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.