95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-28.37%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 7.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-39.78%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-23.08%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 26.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.38%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 17.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 9.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Similar marketing expense growth to FSM's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
-173.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.88%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 8.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-36.68%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-69.19%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 44.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-49.20%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-31.06%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 24.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.43%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 13.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.72%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 37.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.08%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 28.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-358.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.92%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 37.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.41%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 28.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-47.42%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 1013.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.79%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.