PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.29%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 0.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.13%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-0.43%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 25.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.14%
Margin decline while FSM shows 25.23% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.77%
Similar other expenses growth to FSM's 18.70%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-0.98%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-34.53%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 3.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.27%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 176.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.81%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 34.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.43%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 115.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 115.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.41%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.09%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 114.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.41%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 114.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.95%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 159.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.35%
Net income growth below 50% of FSM's 97.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 97.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 97.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 97.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.