PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.61%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSM's 20.44%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.81%
Cost growth less than half of FSM's 17.86%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.39%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 27.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.00%
Margin decline while FSM shows 5.80% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.35%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 573.97%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-15.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.14%
Total costs growth less than half of FSM's 8.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-25.89%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.43%
D&A growth less than half of FSM's 17.68%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
4.61%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.87%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 27.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.31%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.25%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-885.93%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 161.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
21.86%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.12%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Share count increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.39%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.