95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.22%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 25.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.44%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 8.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSM's 65.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 32.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
G&A growth less than half of FSM's 207.27%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-181.22%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
33.90%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSM's 122.56%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.22%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 22.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.55%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.74%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 6.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.35%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 210.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.15%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 1.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.53%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 211.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 189.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-30.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.72%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 206.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 185.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.11%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.01%
Net income decline while FSM shows 132.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.96%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 126.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
EPS decline while FSM shows 133.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 133.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.