95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.63%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 4.66%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSM's 5.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.27%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 2.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.93%
Other expenses change of 164.93% while FSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-21.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.93%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.35%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 17.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
14.65%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 10.24%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
16.07%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 46.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 39.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 73.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.12%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 65.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-535.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-91.87%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 74.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.72%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 66.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
170.24%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 12.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-92.92%
Net income decline while FSM shows 172.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.66%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 160.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.44%
EPS decline while FSM shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.44%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.88%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.