95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.00%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
52.04%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSM's 4.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-1.07%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.58%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 177.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.57%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 21.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
46.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSM's 7.08%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-46.80%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 433.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
66.29%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
23.32%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.54%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.36%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.98%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
8.72%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.98%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.94%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.