95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.25%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 4.22%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.71%
Similar cost growth to FSM's 5.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
29.46%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 2.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.32%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 32.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-153.10%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 184.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.12%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 33.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.98%
Total costs growth less than half of FSM's 12.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-33.79%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.22%
D&A growth less than half of FSM's 11.41%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
17.93%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.54%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.40%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.33%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.16%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 16.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
50.07%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.52%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
260.16%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 51.98%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
47.16%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.95%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.00%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.00%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.38%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.94%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.40%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.