95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.82%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSM's 46.54%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.43%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 28.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
27.82%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSM's 78.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.39%
Similar margin change to FSM's 21.70%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.45%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.41%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.97%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 7.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.87%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 17.72%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-1.54%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 36.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
14.79%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 188.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.80%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 481.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.04%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 485.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.14%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 299.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-23.63%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 20.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
33.96%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 601.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.98%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 378.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-323.90%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 132.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
37.61%
Net income growth below 50% of FSM's 944.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.30%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 675.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.71%
EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 883.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 874.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.90%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 8.05%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.13%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 9.12%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.