95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.84%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-5.28%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.38%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 76.06%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-59.13%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
17.55%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.94%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSM's 62.58%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
19.52%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 7.64%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
8.28%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.49%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 6.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-969.24%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
86.49%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 3.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.19%
Share count change of 0.19% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.