95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.42%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 12.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.00%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 1.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-18.86%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 31.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.96%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 17.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
G&A growth 50-75% of FSM's 192.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
106.14%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of FSM's 169.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-23.15%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 10.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.37%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.57%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 4.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.60%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 12.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.30%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 0.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.52%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 10.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.81%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
474.46%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 10.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
650.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
168.82%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
463.45%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 167.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
635.77%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 139.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
460.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 132.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 132.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.