95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.88%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.48%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 10.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.53%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.58%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
G&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 9.49%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.49%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 398.39%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.69%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of FSM's 26.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-3.37%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 12.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.71%
Interest expense growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.50%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 5.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.60%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.19%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.65%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.70%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.47%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 125.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.30%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.35%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-534.38%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 27.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.43%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.48%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 3.50%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 3.39%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.