95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.68%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.16%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
2.85%
Cost increase while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.02%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSM's 12.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.63%
Margin decline while FSM shows 12.13% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-399.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.04%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.38%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.88%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.47%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.07%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 14.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.61%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 12.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.37%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 32.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.29%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 32.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.30%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.11%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 6.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 6.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
52.70%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.53%
Net income decline while FSM shows 15.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.15%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 15.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.