PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.46%
Similar revenue growth to FSM's 17.72%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
22.50%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSM's 2.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.06%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSM's 41.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.69%
Margin decline while FSM shows 19.95% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 71.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.56%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.79%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 21.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSM's 5.31%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-9.14%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
24.09%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-139.74%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 120.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.66%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 5.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
16.70%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 205.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.31%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 159.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2772.70%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 76.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-307.96%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 261.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-274.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 207.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.86%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSM's 315.91%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-306.84%
Net income decline while FSM shows 232.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-273.15%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 182.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-306.67%
EPS decline while FSM shows 250.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-306.67%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 250.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.14%
Share count change of 0.14% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.16%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.