95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.85%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-22.72%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-10.34%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.15%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
G&A growth while FSM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.33%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 120.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.50%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.93%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.25%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 59.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.37%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 10.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
346.56%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.14%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
97.25%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x FSM's 85.68%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
149.05%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-148.72%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
149.47%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.22%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.