95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.54%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.25%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x FSM's 1.95%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
-33.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-699.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-29.71%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.45%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
127.55%
Interest expense growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.58%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-105.92%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-88.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
128.07%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-89.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.89%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.89%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.