95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.81%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 15.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.07%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 19.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.27%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 6.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 6.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-308.55%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 39.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.80%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 8.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.61%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 18.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.83%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.17%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 23.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-137.27%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 13.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-256.60%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 43.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-286.01%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 25.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.85%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 116.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-322.67%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 67.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-364.48%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 45.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2407.27%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-317.43%
Net income decline while FSM shows 358.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-358.26%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 298.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-315.38%
EPS decline while FSM shows 600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-315.38%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.31%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.