PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.01%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.62%
Cost increase while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
42.43%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.69%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
G&A growth while FSM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.05%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of FSM's 213.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
7.12%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of FSM's 12.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.85%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSM's 1.20%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-12.46%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.19%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
378.13%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.84%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
173.43%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
162.22%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.15%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
157.44%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.67%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.25%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSM's 9.32%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
160.92%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
151.62%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.71%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.71%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.23%
Share count increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.31%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.