95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.17%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 12.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.48%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 2.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.25%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSM's 40.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.42%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 24.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
G&A growth less than half of FSM's 35.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.45%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.37%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 19.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.19%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 4.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.60%
Interest expense growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.46%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.89%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 129.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.97%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 8.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.15%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 718.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.32%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 649.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-20.44%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 18473.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.18%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 1420.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.35%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 1273.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-25.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2.06%
Net income growth below 50% of FSM's 346.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.23%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 318.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 3.95%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.