95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 24.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.90%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 36.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.30%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 11.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 35.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.63%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 460.53%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-55.96%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 33.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.07%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 36.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.61%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 204.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.33%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 24.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.04%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 8.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.48%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.66%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.88%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14030.23%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.90%
Net income growth below 50% of FSM's 42.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.62%
Similar net margin growth to FSM's 14.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
6.06%
EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 42.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 42.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.09%
Share count change of 0.09% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.