PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.94%
Similar revenue growth to FSM's 2.29%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-0.14%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 8.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
3.70%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.73%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
G&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 6.82%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42650.00%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
61.11%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 9.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
4.24%
Total costs growth 50-75% of FSM's 8.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
417.94%
Interest expense growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.41%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 9.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.17%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
221.93%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.31%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.37%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-76.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2.54%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.60%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.13%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.