95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.44%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
19.36%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 8.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.08%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 18.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
G&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 2.89%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.30%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 246.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36.32%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.54%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.14%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.86%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.75%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.90%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 7.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.09%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 4.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.49%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 14.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-176.76%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 19.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.94%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 11.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 22.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-46.04%
Net income decline while FSM shows 65.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.14%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 80.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.15%
EPS decline while FSM shows 55.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.15%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 54.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.13%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.85%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 1.88%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.