95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.41%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
10.38%
Cost growth 50-75% of FSM's 13.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-9.76%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.76%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-41.50%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.56%
Total costs growth less than half of FSM's 10.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.69%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 34.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.99%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x FSM's 10.55%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-1.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.02%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
64.26%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 130.56%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.04%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 100.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.14%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.22%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.