95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.87%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.55%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
18.63%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 5.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.98%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSM's 6.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
G&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 27.90%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 208.04%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
99.80%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 29.76%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.28%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-13.64%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 95.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.21%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.88%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.96%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 7.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.91%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 34.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-203.03%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-15.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
Share count increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.09%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.