95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.14%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 6.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.59%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-3.04%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 55.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.72%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 45.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
G&A growth while FSM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449.59%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.79%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.11%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7152.63%
Interest expense growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.34%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 0.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-30.43%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 155.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 15.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 95.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.89%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 83.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-88.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-31.83%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 111.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 110.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.81%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSM's 151.82%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-32.95%
Net income decline while FSM shows 106.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.20%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 106.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
EPS decline while FSM shows 106.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 106.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.