95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.55%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.66%
Cost increase while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
29.24%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.60%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.98%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 0.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.67%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-97.39%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 31.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.44%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.01%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.39%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.10%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.97%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.98%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 20.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
40.81%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
193.24%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.98%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.