PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.19%
Revenue growth below 50% of FSM's 17.09%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-9.45%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 17.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.00%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of FSM's 17.25%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
7.71%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.61%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 22.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
375.31%
Marketing expense growth while FSM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
3913.82%
Other expenses change of 3913.82% while FSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
42.05%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x FSM's 38.19%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-4.63%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 17.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.70%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.09%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 12.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.21%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 14.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.52%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.22%
Operating income growth 50-75% of FSM's 9.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.96%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-33.56%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 36.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 17.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.60%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
188027.38%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.44%
Net income decline while FSM shows 54.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.31%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 32.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while FSM shows 52.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 53.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 2.84%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.