PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.44%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 9.92%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-42.05%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 3.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
60.21%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 22.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.79%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FSM's 11.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 20.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6243.42%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 1967.75%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
825.37%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 278.05%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
98.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSM's 23.28%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.07%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSM's 2.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
23.81%
Similar D&A growth to FSM's 24.70%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-18.26%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 0.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.72%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
35.25%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSM's 118.29%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-43.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.25%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 20.16%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.