95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.82%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.83%
Cost increase while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
26.25%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.37%
Margin expansion while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.94%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.68%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.47%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.68%
Total costs growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.68%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
26.25%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of KGC's 26.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.56%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.80%
Operating margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.35%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.21%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.01%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-35.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
29.72%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.26%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.03%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.