PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.56%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 17.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.24%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 1.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.22%
Gross profit growth below 50% of KGC's 44.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.95%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.51%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
53.37%
Operating expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.69%
Total costs growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-99.80%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.18%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 38.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.37%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 107.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.10%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 196.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.57%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 245.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.15%
Operating margin decline while KGC shows 194.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
99.79%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.68%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.45%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-129.90%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 0.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.24%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.18%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.