95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.20%
Similar revenue growth to KGC's 12.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
45.00%
Cost growth above 1.5x KGC's 12.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.24%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 11.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 60.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.99%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 17.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.25%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 13.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.50%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 5.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.87%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 2.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.57%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.83%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 9.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.24%
Operating margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-115.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.02%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.73%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
130.14%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.02%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.73%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 2.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.44%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 1.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.