95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
68.51%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
75.60%
Cost increase while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
62.95%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 49.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
58.45%
Total costs growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.09%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
85.52%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.10%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.56%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.34%
Operating margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-109.74%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 54.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
82.05%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 17.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.04%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of KGC's 20.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.87%
Tax expense growth less than half of KGC's 312.50%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
82.05%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.04%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.14%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
83.33%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.38%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.